Comparison of Four-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation vs. One-Channel Electrical Stimulation on Moderate Arm/Hand Paresis in Subacute Stroke Patients
Efficacy of EMG-triggered Four-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation vs. Cyclic One-Channel Electrical Stimulation on Moderate Arm/Hand Paresis in Subacute Stroke Patients. A Randomized Controlled Single Blinded Multicenter Study
About This Trial
This study will compare two treatments that may help participants recover after having suffered from stroke. Persons who experience weakness or paralysis of their arms/hands will be randomly placed in one of two groups. Each receives treatment five times a week for three weeks. One group will be treated with electrostimulation following a cyclic pattern (control treatment), the other group will be treated with electrostimulation triggered by nerve signals (i.e. stimulation starts when they deliberately try to move their arm (investigational treatment). Before and after the three weeks and additionally 12 weeks later, the ability to move the arm and hand will be documented with standardized tests.
Who May Be Eligible (Plain English)
Original Eligibility Criteria
View original clinical language
Treatments Being Tested
Cyclic single channel neuromuscular stimulation
Cyclic single channel neuromuscular stimulation is used to trigger repetitive muscular contractions
Electromyogram-triggered 4 channel neuromuscular stimulation
EMG-MES provides biofeedback by using electromyographic signals to trigger muscular contractions