Comparison of Drainage Methods in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (DEMURE)
Comparison of the Application Effects of Different Drainage Modes in the Perioperative Period of Minimally Invasive Three-Field Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
About This Trial
This RCT compares three drainage approaches after minimally invasive esophagectomy (chest tube + thoracic mediastinal drainage tube, thoracic, and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube) to evaluate perioperative outcomes, addressing current evidence gaps in pain and complication profiles.
Who May Be Eligible (Plain English)
Original Eligibility Criteria
View original clinical language
Treatments Being Tested
Chest mediastinal tube
Transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Abdominal mediastinal tube
Transperitoneal mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Chest tube + chest mediastinal tube
Chest tube insertion combined with transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.