Skip to main content
TrialFinder
TrialFinder is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Always talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you.
RECRUITINGOBSERVATIONAL

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2301)

Important: This information is not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about whether a clinical trial is right for you.

About This Trial

Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma. This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year. The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).

Who May Be Eligible (Plain English)

Who May Qualify: 1. Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years 2. Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma 3. Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19 4. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon) 5. Written willing to sign a consent form Who Should NOT Join This Trial: 1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline 2. Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions 3. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker) 4. Inability to give written willing to sign a consent form 5. Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma 6. Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting Always talk to your doctor about whether this trial is right for you.

Original Eligibility Criteria

View original clinical language
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years 2. Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma 3. Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19 4. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon) 5. Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline 2. Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions 3. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker) 4. Inability to give written informed consent 5. Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma 6. Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting

Treatments Being Tested

PROCEDURE

Awake mapping under local anesthesia

During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

PROCEDURE

Asleep mapping under general anesthesia

During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

PROCEDURE

Resection under general anesthesia without mapping

During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.

Locations (8)

University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
Technical University Munich
Munich, Germany
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Haaglanden Medical Center
The Hague, Netherlands
Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, Switzerland